1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
683DF2D25EB3313FD0025880C003DE645
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-building-world-class-medical-affairs-onboarding-training-function-key-competencies-program-timelines-effectiveness?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.206.14.36
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




Products & Services Medical Affairs Medical Affairs Excellence

Building a World-Class Medical Affairs Onboarding and Training Function: Key Competencies, Program Timelines, and Effectiveness

ID: 5718


Features:

4 Info Graphics

20 Data Graphics

310+ Metrics

18 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 31


Published: 2022


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Building a World-Class Medical Affairs Onboarding and Training Function: Key Competencies, Program Timelines, and Effectiveness”

STUDY OVERVIEW

Medical Affairs professionals often work within a cross-functional environment, effectively linking research and commercial activity. Biopharma companies need to develop robust Medical Affairs onboarding and training programs to effectively prepare new medical leaders in meeting the growing demands of their multifaceted roles.

The program timelines and tools used to deliver training play a key role in the effectiveness of Medical Affairs onboarding and training programs.

Best Practices, LLC undertook this benchmarking research to explore how biopharma companies onboard and train key medical HQ personnel, including Associate Scientific Directors, Scientific Directors and Therapy Area leads. The study provides benchmarks on Medical Affairs onboarding and training program timelines, key competencies, tools, training formats and performance assessment.

KEY TOPICS

  • Key Competencies and Effective Tools
  • Program Timelines
  • Program Evaluation

KEY METRICS
  • How critical are each of the listed competencies for the Medical leaders trained?
  • How effective are each of the listed features included in the learning platform used by benchmarked organizations to ensure accountability and successful completion of onboarding and initial training?
  • How do benchmarked Medical HQ onboarding and training groups ensure competency on the part of newly trained employees?
  • Approximately what percentage of onboarding and training programs are conducted via different listed channels?
  • What modalities are most successful in driving learners toward competency?
  • Usage level vs. Effectiveness rank of modalities
  • What is the ideal amount of time for each kind of virtual session to maximize training impact while acknowledging time limitations?
  • What technologies or tools have been most effective to drive engagement in the virtual setting?
  • How long does it take for a new Medical HQ employee to complete the entire onboarding and training program?
  • Approximately how many hours are spent training around each core competency?
  • Which approaches work best for effectively onboarding and training new Medical HQ personnel?
  • How effective are each of the listed approaches to scheduling training?
  • Which approach best describes how benchmark organizations “layer” their training approach across different training categories?
  • How effective are each of the listed metrics for assessing the effectiveness of onboarding and initial training programs?
  • How do benchmark Medical HQ training groups effectively partner across Medical Affairs to support world-class employee onboarding and development?
  • What is the biggest gap between what onboarding and training programs provide – and what Scientific Directors typically need to succeed on the job?

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS
  • Program Assessment: 71% of Medical HQ onboarding and training groups use certification to ensure competency.
  • Key Competencies: Launch preparation is the top competency for Medical leaders. Review of promotional and field materials are less critical training components.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 20 Medical Affairs leaders from 19 life sciences companies in this research through a benchmarking survey. Deep-dive interviews were also conducted with six onboarding/training leaders to capture further insights.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Medical Device; Biotech; Health Care; Biopharmaceutical; Consumer Products; Clinical Research; Laboratories


Companies Profiled:
Astellas; Boehringer Ingelheim; Boston Scientific; CSL Behring; Eisai; Eli Lilly and Company; Eurofarma; GE Healthcare; GlaxoSmithKline ; Ipsen; Kyowa Kirin; Milestone Pharmaceuticals; Novartis; Rhythm Pharmaceuticals; Sandoz; Sanofi; Servier; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.