1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
68122745A6479B4EA0025880C003D4AE6
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-building-world-class-medical-affairs-onboarding-training-function-structure-staffing-program-execution?opendocument
18
19opendocument
203.238.82.77
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Medical Affairs » Structure, Staffing and Budgets

Building a World-Class Medical Affairs Onboarding and Training Function: Structure, Staffing, and Program Execution

ID: 5717


Features:

6 Info Graphics

19 Data Graphics

290+ Metrics

6 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 32


Published: 2022


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Building a World-Class Medical Affairs Onboarding and Training Function: Structure, Staffing, and Program Execution”

STUDY OVERVIEW

As the Medical Affairs function serves a wide-ranging role in an organization, it is important to develop a comprehensive onboarding and training program for Medical Affairs professionals. In fact, leading biopharma companies have dedicated Medical HQ Onboarding and Training functions to effectively prepare new medical leaders in meeting the rising demands of their multifaceted roles.

The structure, staffing and scope of Medical Affairs onboarding and training programs have a greater impact on the medical function's overall effectiveness.

Best Practices, LLC undertook this benchmarking research to explore how biopharma companies onboard and train key medical HQ personnel, including Associate Scientific Directors, Scientific Directors and Therapy Area leads. The study delivers benchmarks on Medical Affairs onboarding and training program management, structure and staffing.

KEY TOPICS

  • Program Structure and Staffing
  • Medical Affairs Onboarding and Training Program Scope
  • Program Planning, Management and Execution

KEY METRICS
  • Which roles are part of the Medical HQ organization, and which among those roles receive formal training?
  • Which model best describes the way Medical HQ organizations are structured?
  • Approximately how many Medical employees are subject to training requirements in the Medical HQ part of the organization?
  • Approximately how many FTEs do benchmark companies allocate to Medical HQ onboarding and training?
  • Approximately how many of the Medical HQ onboarding and training staff support Functional Skills areas versus Scientific Knowledge areas?
  • Approximately how many total topics does the entire Medical HQ onboarding and training program include?
  • Average number of training topics per FTE
  • Who typically delivers onboarding and training content to employees?
  • Which functions are primarily responsible for managing each onboarding and training component?
  • Who is responsible for developing the learning pathway for each employee?
  • Who maintains and owns the Learning Management System (LMS) used to onboard and train Medical HQ employees?

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS
  • Staffing and Topics Supported: Companies allot an average of 3 FTEs for Medical HQ onboarding and training program, supporting 38 total training topics.
  • Content Delivery: Medical Affairs staff lead SOPs / policies, scientific, medical strategy, and career path. IT leads technology and tools.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 20 Medical Affairs leaders from 19 life sciences companies in this research through a benchmarking survey. Deep-dive interviews were also conducted with six onboarding/training leaders to capture further insights.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Medical Device; Biotech; Health Care; Biopharmaceutical; Consumer Products; Clinical Research; Laboratories


Companies Profiled:
Astellas; Boehringer Ingelheim; Boston Scientific; CSL Behring; Eisai; Eli Lilly and Company; Eurofarma; GE Healthcare; GlaxoSmithKline ; Ipsen; Kyowa Kirin; Milestone Pharmaceuticals; Novartis; Rhythm Pharmaceuticals; Sandoz; Sanofi; Servier; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.