1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6AB70390CED60612A85257615003F6E1A
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-collaborating-with-patient-advocacy-groups-to-educate-the-marketplace?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.97.9.174
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Patient Focused Services » Patient Advocacy Groups

Collaborating with Patient Advocacy Groups to Educate the Marketplace

ID: 5047


Features:

76 Info Graphics

20 Data Graphics

196 Metrics


Pages/Slides: 125


Published: Pre-2020


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from "Collaborating with Patient Advocacy Groups to Educate the Marketplace"


STUDY OVERVIEW

Patient and professional advocacy groups are an integral part of educating the marketplace on new medicines. Effectively collaborating with advocacy groups is fundamental for educating the public on treatment options and is especially critical for socially sensitive conditions/therapies. This benchmarking study identifies valuable practices in working with patient advocacy groups and managing relationships.

The research also examines ideal structures and skill sets for pharma groups that deal with advocacy groups. In addition, the study shares emerging trends and challenges in patient advocacy. Executives and managers who work with pharma groups that interact with advocacy groups can use this study to compare their approaches and tactics for advocacy group interactions with those of leading organizations.

KEY TOPICS

  • Understanding the Advocacy Landscape
  • Managing Advocacy Relationships
  • Managing Relationships with Hostile Groups
  • Advocacy Communication Practices
  • Structuring High Performance Biopharma Advocacy Groups
  • Critical Competencies for Advocacy Liaisons
  • Advocacy Tools - How to Use Tools to Manage Relationships
  • Using New Technologies
  • Advocacy and Product Launch
  • Current Trends and Future Directions


KEY METRICS
  • Tactics to Minimize Opposition from Patient Advocacy/Special Interest Groups
  • Critical Considerations when Managing Advocacy Collaborations regarding Controversial Therapies
  • Effective Market Education Approaches for Controversial Conditions
  • Common Biopharma Patient Advocacy Group Structures
  • Effective Communication Approaches for Advocacy Interactions with Pharma
  • Effectiveness Measures for Pharma Advocacy Group Activities and Relationships
  • Number of FTEs Dedicated to Patient Advocacy Activities
  • Methods for Prioritizing Objectives When Advocacy Groups work with Multiple Brands
  • Rating Importance of Patient Advocacy Collaborations at Different Lifecycle Stages
  • Rating Importance of Education/Program Support Types by Key Lifecycle Stages
  • Best Approaches to Seed an Early Relationship with Patient Advocacy Groups
  • Rating Importance of Platforms for Delivering Education to Patient Advocacy Groups
  • Best Approaches to Deploying Advocacy Grants for Early-Stage Support with Groups
  • Marketplace Factors to be Considered Regarding Patient Advocacy Issues
  • Imporatant Issues Facing Patient Advocacy over Next Three Years

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS

    Mapping The Advocacy Landscape to Know Where to Start:

    Assess the landscape of advocacy and community-interest groups to understand the broad spectrum of players, special interests and possible collaborators. Different groups may prove more valuable collaborators at different stages of the product and disease lifecycle. Some groups will be friendly; some groups may prove hostile. Creating an advocacy“topographical”map is useful to strategic advocacy planning.

    Build Infrastructures for Fast and Effective Response:

    Develop an expertise structure to support rapid response to external special interest groups–both positive and negative–to allow rapid resolution of issues and ongoing intelligence gathering. Create a communications infrastructure for rapid response. Deputize communications leaders for hostile interactions. Centralize information management & response. Stay informed through rapid global updates on hostile group activities. Respond locally to attacks to avoid global issue spread. Never antagonize groups whose interests diverge from yours.

METHODOLOGY

Fifty-eight representatives from 43 companies shared their insights in the benchmark survey and more than a dozen participated in deep-dive interviews. Approximately half of the class represented top-50 bio-pharma companies. In addition, several mid-cap and smaller organizations shared both current and historical perspectives from the experience in advocacy roles.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Diagnostic; Biotech; Medical Device; Health Care; Manufacturing; Consumer Products; Chemical; Media; Service; Technology; Research


Companies Profiled:
Abbott Laboratories; Abaxis; Purdue Pharma; Allos Therapeutics; Discovery Chicago; Daiichi Sankyo; Amgen; Anesiva; Covidien; Astellas; Vital Therapies; Baxter Healthcare; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Bayer; United Therapeutics; Eisai; Nupathe; Genentech; Boston Scientific; Genzyme; Novartis; GlaxoSmithKline; Becton Dickinson; IDS Canada; Medrad; Infosys BPO; Johnson & Johnson; King Pharmaceuticals; Ocimum Biosolutions; Onyx Pharmaceuticals; Philips Home Healthcare; Savient Pharmaceuticals; Solvay Pharmaceuticals; Synapse biomedical; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Talecris; Theratechnologies; Tibotec; Thoratec Corporation; Triple S; ANS

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.