1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
69E0158C33516063F85257BB0005FF0C0
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-consumer-marketing-qualitative-quantitative-research-techniques-and-tools?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2034.204.173.45
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




Products & Services Market Research, Analytics and Forecasting Process Excellence and Productivity Management

Consumer Marketing Research Innovation: The Changing Landscape for Qualitative and Quantitative Research

ID: 5255


Features:

11 Info Graphics

14 Data Graphics

80+ Metrics

6 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 32


Published: Pre-2014


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:
close

Single User: Authorizes use by the person who places the order or for whom the order was placed.

Sitewide: Authorizes use of the report for a geographic site. All people at site can view the report for a year and copies can be printed.

Corporate: Authorizes use for the entire company for a year and copies can be printed. No limitations for usage inside the company.




Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from "Consumer Marketing Research Innovation: The Changing Landscape for Qualitative and Quantitative Research"


STUDY OVERVIEW

New technologies are transforming how consumers educate themselves and make critical purchasing decisions. Correspondingly, across industry sectors the consumer marketing research playbook and analysis approaches are evolving to better identify winning tools and techniques for understanding consumers' decisions.
Best Practices, LLC conducted this cross-industry benchmarking study to identify current and evolving approaches for qualitative and quantitative consumer marketing research techniques and tools. This research examines the changing landscape for qualitative and quantitative research. It also reviews which quantitative research approaches market research leaders are currently utilizing most and why.

This study includes data on three segments: pharmaceutical companies, non-pharmaceutical companies and the Total Benchmark Class.

KEY TOPICS

  • Utilization of Qualitative Research
  • Utilization of Quantitative Research
  • Utilization Level of Specific Quantitative Research Techniques
  • Utilization of Combinations of Existing Market Research Tools or Techniques

SAMPLE KEY METRICS
  • What is overall trend in qualitative research - more, less, same (Total Benchmark Class)
  • Why doing more qualitative marketing research (Total Benchmark Class)
  • Why doing less qualitative marketing research (Total Benchmark Class)
  • What is overall trend in quantitative research - more, less, same (Total Benchmark Class)
  • Why doing more quantitative research (Total Benchmark Class)
  • Why doing less quantitative research (Total Benchmark Class)
  • Utilization level of 10 quantitative research tools for last 2-3 years (Pharma)
  • Utilization level of 10 quantitative research tools for last 2-3 years (Nonpharma)
  • Utilization level of quantitative research tools for last 2-3 years (Total Benchmark Class)
  • Reasons for changes of quantitative tools usage in pharma
  • Reasons for changes of quantitative tools usage in non-pharma
  • Reasons for changes of quantitative tools usage in total benchmark class
  • Are you using innovative combinations of existing market research tools or techniques (pharma)
  • Are you using innovative combinations of existing market research tools or techniques (non-pharma)
SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS
  • Online Qualitative Research Offers Advantages over Traditional Qualitative Studies: Online qualitative research is a valuable and effective alternative to traditional tools like focus groups.
    • The online format removes the geographical boundaries that can make the creation of a representative sample so challenging in focus groups.
    • Online qual makes it easier to do asynchronous studies
    • It gives participants more of a feeling of anonymity and thus makes them more likely to talk about how they really feel.

STUDY METHODOLOGY


Fifty-nine benchmark survey respondents from 58 companies participated in this study. In addition, research analysts conducted executive interviews with eight selected respondents to collect qualitative data and insights.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Health Care; Market Research; Marketing; Service; Transportation; Insurance; Advertising; Biotech; Biopharmaceutical; Clinical Research; Laboratories; Utilities; Consulting; Manufacturing; Financial Services; Telecommunications; Education; Real Estate; Electronics; Computer Hardware; Computer Software; Communications; Medical Device; Professional Services; Consumer Products


Companies Profiled:
Grifols; HIT Global; Sample Answers; Lifestyle Marketing; Veeda Clinical Research; Metropolitan; Midwest Employers Casualty Company; Catalpha; Sanofi; SMUD; ic axon; SCL Systems Consulting; Coleman; The SoNo Group; DDI; IBS; Merck Serono; uatae; National Housing Trust; MTS; Daiichi Sankyo; Sekisanchi ; Landmark Group; Emirates Post; Ferring Pharmaceuticals; 20/20 Research; CDW; Quadra; GE Healthcare; vetoquinol; synergesic; Independence Blue Cross; ARIAD; gemalto; Teva Neuroscience; Klick Health; EMD Serono; EPR; Merck; Bright Horizons; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; R2Business Solutions; Janssen; brunner; Novo Nordisk; Zillner; Johnson & Johnson; HFS Research; Biogen Idec; Medtronic; UCB Pharma; American Dental Association; Maxcom; China HR Insight; Convergys; Unilever; MidAmerican Energy Company; Emirates Group

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.