1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6FA575DC7234C472385257FB70054922D
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-corporate-library-services-benchmarks-2016-pharmaceutical-industry?opendocument
18
19opendocument
203.237.15.145
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Business Operations » Corporate Libraries

Library Services Benchmarks 2016: Corporate Library Services in the Pharmaceutical Industry

ID: 5414


Features:

10 Info Graphics

24 Data Graphics

180+ Metrics


Pages/Slides: 45


Published: Pre-2019


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from "Library Services Benchmarks 2016: Corporate Library Services in the Pharmaceutical Industry"

STUDY OVERVIEW

Technology advances and budget constraints have had a sizable impact on corporate libraries within the pharmaceutical industry. Best Practices, LLC conducted this study to help library and information center leaders compare scope, volume, cost, and delivery of library services at their companies with those at other organizations within the biopharmaceutical industry.

Organizations can use this study to evaluate core services, vendor utilization, staffing and funding levels, and innovation strategies for their corporate library or information center.

KEY TOPICS

  • Library Profile
  • Library Services
  • Human Resources
  • Financial Resources
  • Library Innovation
  • Service Strategies

SAMPLE KEY METRICS/QUESTIONS
  • Core services offered at your organization
  • Services providing vendor vs. internal library staff
  • Total number of FTEs providing library or information services
  • Allocation of FTEs by labor categories
  • Percentage of staff holding accredited master's degrees and advanced degrees
  • Total cost of library services and resources
  • Methods used to recover costs
  • Expected rate increases for renewal agreements with vendors
  • Concessions expected from vendors for multi-year agreements
  • Number of months prior to renewal date when negotiations begin
  • Innovations developed to improve service delivery
  • Strategies to deliver quality services within tight budgets

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS
  • People Allocation: Participants allocate the most FTE hours (average 23%) to electronic resource management, followed by reference and research at 20% and analytical & value added services at 19% respectively. Print-related services took only 3% of hours for benchmark participants. Several libraries indicated they no longer manage any print resources.
  • Renewal Agreement Negotiations: Majority of libraries expect less than 5% increase annually while renewing agreements with vendors. While negotiating renewals with vendors half of them expect a discount on annual fees. The contract renewal discussion begins 1-3 months prior to subscription date at 47% of companies.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 17 leaders from 16 top biopharmaceutical companies through a benchmarking survey.

Industries Profiled:
Chemical; Pharmaceutical; Manufacturing; Biotech; Consumer Products; Diagnostic; Medical Device; Health Care; Biopharmaceutical; Clinical Research; Laboratories


Companies Profiled:
BASF Corporation; Daiichi Sankyo; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Ferring Pharmaceuticals; GlaxoSmithKline ; MedImmune; Merck; Pfizer; Novo Nordisk; Purdue Pharma; UCB Pharma; Sanofi; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Vertex Pharmaceuticals

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.