1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6793B5AF5E9455B57652580DD00198A3D
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-data-dissemination-policies-global-field-medical-teams-benchmarks-best-practices?opendocument
18
19opendocument
203.237.15.145
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Medical Affairs » Data Management and Biostatics

Determining Best Practices for Data Dissemination Policies for Global Field Medical Teams

ID: 5453


Features:

4 Info Graphics

21 Data Graphics

100+ Metrics


Pages/Slides: 31


Published: Pre-2019


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Determining Best Practices for Data Dissemination Policies for Global Field Medical Teams”

STUDY OVERVIEW

With the growing emphasis on value-based pricing and evidence-based medicine in the bio-pharmaceutical industry, organizations are turning to their Medical Affairs function to streamline the dissemination of on-label and off-label data to key stakeholders. However, the challenge is to remain vigilant of compliance regulations while formulating guidelines around data discussions for global field medical teams.

Best Practices, LLC conducted benchmarking research to help Medical Affairs leaders better understand how the on-label and off-label data discussions are approached by field medical teams at leading bio-pharmaceutical companies in four major regions across the world including North America, Europe, APAC and Emerging Markets.

KEY TOPICS

  • On-Label and Off-Label Field Medical Data Dissemination
  • Off-Label Proactive Data Discussions
  • Off-Label Data Discussion Restrictions
  • Data Dissemination Prior to Label Change
  • Data Dissemination Follow-Up

KEY METRICS

  • Please indicate how your field medical teams approach both on-label and off-label data discussions
  • Are proactive off-label data discussions with HCPs by your field medical team allowed?
  • Please select the restrictions on off-label data discussions
  • Do you proactively disseminate major data releases prior to label change?
  • Please select the most appropriate response to address how data dissemination is approved

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS

  • Off-label Data Usually Shared on Request While On-label Shared More Proactively: Companies mostly take a reactive approach towards off-label requests across all markets and no company chooses to proactively share information on off-label requests. However, when it comes to on-label data dissemination, 67% of companies in US, and 50% in Europe address off-label requests reactively. Similarly in APAC and in Emerging Markets, 39% and 44% of the participants respectively handle off-label data requests reactively.

METHODOLOGY


Best Practices, LLC engaged 18 leaders from 13 leading bio-pharmaceutical companies through a benchmarking survey instrument. Nearly 70% of participants are at the level of director or above.


Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Manufacturing; Biotech; Consumer Products; Diagnostic; Medical Device; Health Care; Biopharmaceutical; Clinical Research; Laboratories


Companies Profiled:
Abbvie; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Daiichi Sankyo; Gilead Sciences; Janssen; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche; Sanofi; Santen; Sunovion; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.