1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
67D975883299E709800258BBE0040C2AC
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-effective-immunology-medical-insights-management-team-structure-effectiveness-lessons-learned?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.97.9.168
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Medical Affairs » Medical Communication

Effective Immunology Medical Insights Management: Team Structure, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned

ID: 5833


Features:

21 Info Graphics

31 Data Graphics

410+ Metrics

15 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 64


Published: 2024


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Effective Immunology Medical Insights Management: Team Structure, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned”

STUDY OVERVIEW

Immunology Medical Affairs teams require a well-structured framework to ensure the effective dissemination of insights, ensuring their strategies are aligned with both internal stakeholders and the wider medical community. However, many struggle to establish cohesive systems that deliver timely and impactful medical insights.


Best Practices, LLC undertook this benchmark study to help Immunology Medical Affairs teams refine their approaches to insight management. The study explores the structural frameworks, effectiveness, and lessons learned from leading organizations in gathering and disseminating immunology insights.

Benchmark data is broken down into two different segments to provide deeper insights. Classifications reflect their approach and standing in immunology medical insight generation: Insight Leaders (5 respondents) and Insight Majority (18 respondents).

KEY TOPICS

  • Structure of Immunology Medical Insights and Dissemination Group
  • Disseminating Immunology Insights: Tools, Activities and Effectiveness
  • Best Practices and Key Lessons Learned
  • Actionable Insights and Intelligence Gathering in Immunology

KEY METRICS

  • Presence of a separate group that gathers and disseminates immunology insights for Medical Affairs – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Role of each of the groups within Medical Affairs for both gathering and disseminating immunology insights – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Roles of Medical Affairs sub-functions in gathering and disseminating immunology insights – Insight Leaders and Insight Majority
  • Lead and support role of Medical Affairs groups in gathering and disseminating immunology insights – Total benchmark class
  • Level of expertise of the person who is responsible for conveying immunology medical insights to other functions – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Strengths and weaknesses of immunology insights gathering and dissemination group structure
  • Breakdown of intelligence deliverables types in immunology – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Tools used by Immunology Medical teams to deliver insights to other functions – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Effectiveness and importance of digital tools used by the Immunology Medical Affairs team to gather, evaluate, and disseminate intelligence – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Additional methods used by Immunology Medical Affairs teams to gather intelligence (beyond KOL and HCP engagement)

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS

  • Medical Affairs Insight Leadership: Most companies rely on Field Teams (72%) and Medical Strategy (67%) to lead the insight process. However, leading organizations have thought-leader management and operations step in as well.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 23 executives from 17 leading life sciences companies focused on immunology for this research. The study insights are mostly from directors and higher management executives, representing nearly 80% of the benchmark participants.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Communications; Manufacturing; Biotech; Consumer Products; Diagnostic; Medical Device; Chemical; Health Care; Biopharmaceutical; Clinical Research; Laboratories


Companies Profiled:
AbbVie; ApotheCom; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; CSL Behring; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech; Janssen; Mallinckrodt; Merck KGaA; Merck; Novartis; Orchard Therapeutics; Sanofi Genzyme; Sanofi; Sandoz; Takeda Pharmaceuticals

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.