1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6FE5C6C76D404D5E400258C0D0050E611
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-effective-neurology-medical-insights-management-team-structure-effectiveness-lessons-learned?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.97.9.169
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Medical Affairs » Medical Communication

Effective Neurology Medical Insights Management: Team Structure, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned

ID: 5847


Features:

21 Info Graphics

31 Data Graphics

370+ Metrics

15 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 64


Published: 2025


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Effective Neurology Medical Insights Management: Team Structure, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned”

STUDY OVERVIEW

The ability to effectively gather and disseminate insights is critical for bridging cutting-edge neuroscience discoveries with clinical applications. Neurology-focused Medical Affairs teams, therefore, need well-structured frameworks to ensure clear, impactful communication across internal and external stakeholders.

Best Practices, LLC conducted this research to benchmark the structures and processes used by Neurology-focused Medical Affairs teams. The study highlights lessons from leading organizations, providing actionable insights for optimizing insight flow and achieving communication excellence in Neurology.

Benchmark data is broken down into two different segments to provide deeper insights. Classifications reflect their approach and standing in neurology medical insight generation: Insight Leaders (3 respondents) and Insight Majority (15 respondents).


KEY TOPICS

  • Structure of Neurology Medical Insights and Dissemination Group
  • Disseminating Neurology Insights: Tools, Activities and Effectiveness
  • Best Practices and Key Lessons Learned
  • Actionable Insights and Intelligence Gathering in Neurology

KEY METRICS

  • Presence of a separate group that gathers and disseminates neurology insights for Medical Affairs – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Role of each of the groups within Medical Affairs for both gathering and disseminating neurology insights – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Roles of Medical Affairs sub-functions in gathering and disseminating neurology insights – Insight Leaders and Insight Majority
  • Lead and support role of Medical Affairs groups in gathering and disseminating neurology insights – Total benchmark class
  • Level of expertise of the person who is responsible for conveying neurology medical insights to other functions – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Strengths and weaknesses of neurology insights gathering and dissemination group structure
  • Breakdown of intelligence deliverables types in neurology – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Tools used by Neurology Medical teams to deliver insights to other functions – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Effectiveness and importance of digital tools used by the Neurology Medical Affairs team to gather, evaluate, and disseminate intelligence – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Additional methods used by Neurology Medical Affairs teams to gather intelligence (beyond KOL and HCP engagement)

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS

  • Medical Affairs Insight Leadership: Most companies lean on Medical Field Teams (91%) and Health Outcomes (55%) to lead the insight process. Leading organizations, however, also involve thought-leader management and Medical Communications, ensuring a multifaceted and strategic insight leadership framework.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 18 executives from 17 leading life sciences companies focused on neurology for this research. The study insights are mostly from directors and higher management executives, representing nearly 80% of the benchmark participants.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Communications; Biopharmaceutical; Biotech; Chemical; Health Care; Consumer Products; Medical Device


Companies Profiled:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals; ApotheCom; Biohaven Pharmaceuticals; EMD Serono; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech; Janssen; Lundbeck; Merck; Merck KGaA; Novartis; Nutricia; Orchard Therapeutics; Roche; Sunovion; Teva Pharmaceuticals; Terumo BCT: Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.