1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6044751A0DD3E1BDB00258BBE00411C20
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-effective-psychiatry-cns-medical-insights-management-team-structure-effectiveness-lessons-learned?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.97.14.85
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Medical Affairs » Medical Communication

Effective Psychiatry / CNS Medical Insights Management: Team Structure, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned

ID: 5855


Features:

21 Info Graphics

30 Data Graphics

330+ Metrics

15 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 63


Published: 2025


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Effective Psychiatry / CNS Medical Insights Management: Team Structure, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned”

STUDY OVERVIEW

The dynamic and evolving landscape of psychiatry and CNS disorders presents unique challenges for Medical Affairs teams striving to disseminate scientific and clinical insights. With an increasing volume of data and rapidly changing treatment paradigms, it is absolutely critical to establish an effective framework to manage and share critical information.

This benchmarking study by Best Practices, LLC explores the structural components that top-performing Medical Affairs teams use to optimize insight dissemination in psychiatry and CNS. The study provides key benchmarks, highlights successful dissemination models, and offers lessons learned from industry leaders who have mastered the art of delivering impactful scientific insights in this complex therapeutic area.

Benchmark data is broken down into two different segments to provide deeper insights. Classifications reflect their approach and standing in psychiatry / CNS medical insight generation: Insight Leaders (3 respondents) and Insight Majority (11 respondents).


KEY TOPICS

  • Structure of Psychiatry / CNS Medical Insights and Dissemination Group
  • Disseminating Psychiatry / CNS Insights: Tools, Activities and Effectiveness
  • Best Practices and Key Lessons Learned
  • Actionable Insights and Intelligence Gathering in Psychiatry / CNS

KEY METRICS

  • Presence of a separate group that gathers and disseminates psychiatry / CNS insights for Medical Affairs – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Role of each of the groups within Medical Affairs for both gathering and disseminating psychiatry / CNS insights – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Lead and support role of Medical Affairs groups in gathering and disseminating psychiatry / CNS insights – Total benchmark class
  • Roles of Medical Affairs sub-functions in gathering and disseminating psychiatry / CNS insights – Insight Leaders and Insight Majority
  • Level of expertise of the person who is responsible for conveying psychiatry / CNS medical insights to other functions – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Strengths and weaknesses of psychiatry / CNS insights gathering and dissemination group structure
  • Breakdown of intelligence deliverables types in psychiatry / CNS – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Tools used by Psychiatry / CNS-focused Medical teams to deliver insights to other functions – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Effectiveness and importance of digital tools used by the Psychiatry / CNS-focused Medical Affairs team to gather, evaluate, and disseminate intelligence – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Additional methods used by Psychiatry / CNS-focused Medical Affairs teams to gather intelligence (beyond KOL and HCP engagement)

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS

  • Insight Gathering Process and Its Effectiveness: Around 36% of Psychiatry / CNS participants have a separate insight group to manage medical data. Most rely on various subfunctions to coordinate multiple activities for gathering and inputting data, often leading to inefficiencies. Coordination across inter-functional groups is attempted but often yields limited success.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 14 executives from 12 leading life sciences companies specializing in psychiatry / CNS for this research. The study insights are mostly from directors and higher management executives, representing nearly 80% of the benchmark participants.

Industries Profiled:
Biopharmaceutical; Communications; Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Health Care


Companies Profiled:
Alkermes; ApotheCom; Boehringer Ingelheim; Eli Lilly and Company; Janssen; Lundbeck; Merck; Sage Therapeutics; Servier; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Teva Pharmaceuticals

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.