1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
690887A9E3EED484800258C37004BDF5B
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-effective-psychiatry-cns-medical-insights-management-tools-activities-training?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.97.14.85
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Medical Affairs » Medical Communication

Effective Psychiatry / CNS Medical Insights Management: Tools, Activities, and Training

ID: 5856


Features:

8 Info Graphics

47 Data Graphics

930+ Metrics

2 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 64


Published: 2025


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from “Effective Psychiatry / CNS Medical Insights Management: Tools, Activities, and Training”

STUDY OVERVIEW

In the field of psychiatry and CNS, where treatment landscapes shift rapidly and new scientific discoveries emerge at an unprecedented pace, Medical Affairs teams must leverage cutting-edge tools, well-planned activities, and comprehensive training to stay ahead. Having the right infrastructure in place is essential to navigating the complexities of these therapeutic areas and ensuring effective insight dissemination.

Best Practices, LLC conducted this study to uncover the most effective tools, activities, and training methodologies used by leading Medical Affairs teams in psychiatry and CNS. This study delivers key benchmarks, highlights innovative approaches, and provides actionable insights to enhance the efficiency and impact of Medical Affairs functions in this critical therapeutic space.

Benchmark data is broken down into two different segments to provide deeper insights. Classifications reflect their approach and standing in psychiatry / CNS medical insight generation: Insight Leaders (3 respondents) and Insight Majority (11 respondents).


KEY TOPICS

  • Psychiatry / CNS Insights Gathering Activities
  • Coordination for Psychiatry / CNS Insights Gathering
  • Training Techniques and Tools for Psychiatry / CNS Insights Gathering

KEY METRICS

  • Highly effective team coordination tactics and tools within Medical Affairs – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Effectiveness of listed tactics and tools used by the Psychiatry / CNS-focused Medical Affairs group to coordinate work, data, and analyses for stakeholders – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Use of different tools for psychiatry / CNS insight gathering in Medical Affairs; Integration of insights into a unified platform using different tools
  • Percentage of intelligence gathering work involving primary (field) research and secondary research in psychiatry / CNS – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Effectiveness and importance of primary and secondary data collection sources in psychiatry / CNS – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Frequency of usage of primary and secondary sources for collecting intelligence data within Psychiatry / CNS-focused Medical Affairs – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Effectiveness of internal sources that support intelligence data collection in psychiatry / CNS – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Functions and groups used within Psychiatry / CNS-focused Medical Affairs organization to narrow the focus of the issue and discover information gaps – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority
  • Internal limitations to receiving psychiatry / CNS medical insights
  • Effectiveness of training techniques for insights data collection in psychiatry / CNS – Total benchmark class, Insight Leaders, and Insight Majority

SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS

  • Insight Gathering Tools: Of those 67% of teams who utilize different insight gathering tools, 18% integrate their collections into a single platform.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 14 executives from 12 leading life sciences companies specializing in psychiatry / CNS for this research. The study insights are mostly from directors and higher management executives, representing nearly 80% of the benchmark participants.

Industries Profiled:
Biopharmaceutical; Communications; Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Health Care


Companies Profiled:
Alkermes; ApotheCom; Boehringer Ingelheim; Eli Lilly and Company; Janssen; Lundbeck; Merck; Sage Therapeutics; Servier; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Teva Pharmaceuticals

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.