1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
69C8090F821EB02370025864D005B31E4
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/db-establishing-promotion-review-editor-to-oversee-advertising-promotion-review-process?opendocument
18
19opendocument
203.232.96.22
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




Products & Services Brand Management and Product Leadership Product Marketing and Innovation

Establishing a Promotion Review Editor to Oversee Advertising and Promotion Review Process

ID: 5658


Features:

11 Info Graphics

14 Data Graphics

188 Metrics

1 Narratives


Pages/Slides: 34


Published: 2021


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:
close

Single User: Authorizes use by the person who places the order or for whom the order was placed.

Sitewide: Authorizes use of the report for a geographic site. All people at site can view the report for a year and copies can be printed.

Corporate: Authorizes use for the entire company for a year and copies can be printed. No limitations for usage inside the company.




Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from "Establishing a Promotion Review Editor to Oversee Advertising and Promotion Review Process"

STUDY OVERVIEW

Review of advertising and promotional material can be critical and challenging as it involves deeper knowledge of product and regulations. This study examines collaboration approaches, roles and responsibilities, importance and effectiveness of Promotion Review Editor within the company to streamline the review process with more productivity.


Best Practices, LLC conducted this targeted Promotion Review Editor study; it highlights the proportion of companies that currently utilize this position, those that are planning to, and those that are not. In addition, it is designed to probe the primary and secondary responsibilities of editors in this role and where they are located within the company.

This study also examines the involvement of Promotion Review Editor in electronic submissions and the review process of promotional materials The benchmark study is segmented into Large Pharma, companies with Promotion Review Editor role in place or planning to have in future to evaluate their current review process collaboration strategies and effectiveness of editor role.

KEY TOPICS

  • Role presence and reporting of Promotion Review Editor
  • Importance and effectiveness of Promotion Review Editor
  • Involvement of Promotion Review Editor in electronic submissions and review process
  • Responsibilities lead and supported by Promotion Review Editor in review process
  • Time spent in Promotion Review Editor role
  • Best practices and challenges with Promotion Review Editor
KEY METRICS
  • Do you have Promotion Review Editor role as part of advertising and promotional review process?
  • Which functiono is Promotion Review Editor located in?
  • What group does Promotion Review Editor report to?
  • Who does Promotion Review Editor report to?
  • Why did company place editor role within function it did?
  • How many products does a single editor support?
  • How important and effective do you think your Promotion Review Editor role is?
  • Do you submit advertising and promtional materials to FDA electronically?
  • Is Promotion Review Editor involved in electronic submissions?
  • Does Promotion Review Editor have a remediation role?
  • What are Promotion Review Editor responsibilities in review process?
  • What percentage of time spent on each activity listed?
  • Cite two best practices in Promotion Review Editor role
  • Cite two challenges in Promotion Review Editor role
SAMPLE KEY FINDINGS
  • Place Promotion Review Editor in Either Regulatory or Marketing Communications: The role is typically located in Regulatory overall. Over one-third of companies place their editor role in regulatory and/or report to regulatory.
  • Strategically Choose Promotion Review Editor Based on Transferable Knowledge: The majority of Promotion Review Editors support 3 or more products. Picking a Promotion Review Editor with broad product knowledge will be optimal.

METHODOLOGY

Best Practices, LLC engaged 24 leaders from 23 biopharmaceutical companies and organizations through a benchmarking survey.


Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Medical; Biopharmaceutical; Consumer Products; Biotech; Health Care; Medical Device; Science; High Tech; Manufacturing; Diagnostic


Companies Profiled:
Merck Serono; Ultradent Products; Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Relypsa; Novartis; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals; Allergan; GlaxoSmithKline ; GE Healthcare; Baxter Healthcare; Thermo Fisher; Mylan; Agilent Technologies; Hill-Rom; Horizon Therapeutics; Intercept; Dermira; Smith & Nephew; Fisher & Paykel; LEO Pharma; Karyopharm Therapeutics; Accelerate Diagnostics; Needle Tech Products

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.