Rare Blood Disorders MSL Team Excellence: Benchmarking Roles and Staffing Levels

• Rare Blood Disorders Staffing Levels: Traditional MSLs vs. Hybrid MSLs
• Drivers of Rare Blood Disorders Field Team Evolution
• Medical vs. Commercial Field Resourcing

• How many MSLs and senior MSLs of each type (Traditional MSLs vs. Hybrid MSLs vs. Virtual MSLs) are currently staffed to the Rare Blood Disorders field team?
• Average number of Rare Blood MSLs; MSL-to-senior MSL ratio at benchmark Rare Blood Disorders organizations
• How effective are each of the listed MSL job roles in Rare Blood Disorders segment?
• How critical have each of the listed factors been in shaping the current size and composition of roles within the Rare Blood Disorders field team?
• Predicted changes in rare blood disorders MSL staffing levels over the next 12-24 months
• How many staff (FTEs) are currently allocated to the listed Rare Blood Disorders field team roles?

• Assessing MSL effectiveness by type: Field-based and hybrid MSLs are deemed similarly effective by benchmark organizations, with approximately 80% calling them “highly effective” or “somewhat effective” in their niche. In terms of future investment, 38% of field leaders predict slight-to-moderate growth in field-based MSL staffing levels over the next 2 years, while another only 42% predict similar growth in hybrid staffing levels.

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.