1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6E67C9429FFF388EB00258C7500301C58
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/disease-awareness-program-excellence-cns-neurology-structure-activities-resources-needed-effective-pipeline-support
18
19
2018.97.9.172
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25BMR




» Products & Services » » Product Launch » Influences on Market Entry

Disease Awareness Program Excellence in CNS / Neurology: Structure, Activities, and Resources Needed for Effective Pipeline Support

ID: PSM-396


Features:

10 Info Graphics

41 Data Graphics

740+ Metrics

11 Narratives


Pages: 62


Published: 2025


Delivery Format: Shipped


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 

919-403-0251

  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • STUDY SNAPSHOT
  • KEY FINDINGS
  • VIEW TOC AND LIST OF EXHIBITS
Neurological and central nervous system (CNS) disorders often present with complex symptoms and are prone to delayed diagnoses—making disease awareness a critical lever for early recognition and intervention. To drive meaningful impact, biopharma organizations must execute timely, targeted campaigns that engage and inform patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers, while also preparing the market for upcoming treatments.

Best Practices, LLC conducted this benchmarking study to identify the strategies and lessons learned from leading CNS-focused awareness campaigns. This report delivers critical insights into campaign structure, resource allocation, message timing, key activities, and partnership strategies that support success in this evolving therapeutic area.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Manufacturing; Biopharmaceutical; Public Relations; Chemical; Health Care; Communications


Companies Profiled:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals; Biogen; Catalyst Pharmaceuticals; FleishmanHillard; Genentech; Genzyme; Indivior; Merck KGaA; NexGen Healthcare

Study Snapshot

Best Practices, LLC conducted this benchmarking research by engaging 9 leaders from 9 life sciences organizations specializing in CNS therapies. In addition to quantitative input, several participants shared deeper operational perspectives through one-on-one interviews. Relevant secondary research is incorporated to provide additional context.

Key topics covered in this report include:

  • Disease awareness program structure
  • Timing of disease awareness activities
  • Budget and resource planning for CNS campaigns
  • Partnering with Advocacy Groups and Legal
  • Leveraging social media for CNS education

Key Findings

Select key insights uncovered from this report are noted below. Detailed findings are available in the full report.

  • Budget and Funding: Launch year and launch -1 year are the peak periods for disease awareness spending.
  • Social Media Activities: Top-ranked social media activities to generate disease awareness in CNS / neurology include: (1) Social media listening, (2) online physician communities, and (3) online patient communities.
Table of Contents

Sr. No.
Topic
Slide No.
I.
Overview and ObjectivesPg. 3-6
II.
Program Effectiveness: Practices & PitfallsPg. 7-10
III.
Program StructurePg. 11-15
IV.
Tactics and TimingPg. 16-24
V.
Budget and SpendingPg. 25-35
VI.
Involvement of Advocacy Groups and Legal in Disease AwarenessPg. 36-48
VII.
Social MediaPg. 49-58
VIII.
Participant DemographicsPg. 59-61
IX.
About Best Practices, LLCPg. 62

    List of Charts & Exhibits

    I. Program Effectiveness: Practices & Pitfalls

    • Effectiveness of CNS-focused disease awareness initiatives
    • Key practices supporting success in CNS disease awareness efforts
    • Common missteps and barriers observed in CNS disease awareness campaigns

    II. Program Structure

    • Organizational structure of CNS / neurology disease awareness programs – Total benchmark class
    • Organizational structure of disease awareness programs – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma, Global teams vs. Country level teams, Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Functional involvement and leadership in CNS / neurology disease awareness programs
    • Prevalence of dedicated CNS disease awareness teams

    III. Tactics and Timing
    • Start and endpoints for disease awareness resourcing – Total benchmark class
    • Start and endpoints for disease awareness resourcing – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Start and endpoints for disease awareness resourcing – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Start and endpoints for disease awareness resourcing – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Start and endpoints for disease awareness resourcing – Highly competitive market vs. Less competitive market
    • Interview narratives around the dividends from disease awareness programs
    • Timing and utilization of CNS disease awareness activities
    • Most utilized CNS disease awareness activities

    IV. Budget and Spending

    • Timing of disease awareness investment across development and launch cycle
    • Total budget for CNS / neurology disease awareness initiatives, activities and programs – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Peak year CNS / neurology disease awareness investment – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Total budget for CNS / neurology disease awareness initiatives, activities and programs – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Total budget for CNS / neurology disease awareness initiatives, activities and programs – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Factors influencing the amount of resources dedicated to disease awareness programs on a product-by-product basis – Total benchmark class
    • Factors influencing the amount of resources dedicated to disease awareness programs on a product-by-product basis – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Factors influencing the amount of resources dedicated to disease awareness programs on a product-by-product basis – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Functions providing funding for CNS-focused disease awareness programs
    • Disease awareness investment for new CNS treatments addressing unmet clinical needs

    V. Involvement of Advocacy Groups and Legal in Disease Awareness

    • Interview narratives around patient advocacy group relationships
    • Importance of each patient advocacy group activity and support service from a disease awareness program perspective – Total benchmark class
    • Importance of each patient advocacy group activity and support service from a disease awareness program perspective – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Importance of each patient advocacy group activity and support service from a disease awareness program perspective – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Best approaches to support disease awareness activities with patient advocacy groups
    • Importance of highly effective patient advocacy group activities and support services from a disease awareness program perspective – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Importance of highly effective patient advocacy group activities and support services from a disease awareness program perspective – Highly competitive market vs. Less competitive market
    • Timing of disease awareness activities with patient advocacy groups
    • Level of involvement of legal department in each of the listed disease awareness program areas – Total benchmark class
    • Level of involvement of legal department in each of the listed disease awareness program areas – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Level of involvement of legal department in each of the listed disease awareness program areas – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Interview narrative around managing successful programs with legal groups

    VI. Social Media

    • CNS / neurology disease awareness activities conducted on social media and timing of first initiation of each activity – Total benchmark class
    • CNS / neurology disease awareness activities conducted on social media and timing of first initiation of each activity – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Utilization ranking of social media activities for generating disease awareness in CNS / neurology
    • Interview narrative around ensuring patient access via social media
    • Interview narrative around getting direct feedback and insights
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities – Total benchmark class
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities and percentage of overall disease awareness budget spent on social media – Mid-small pharma
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities and percentage of overall disease awareness budget spent on social media – Country level teams
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities and percentage of overall disease awareness budget spent on social media – Single brand teams

    VII. Participant Demographics

    • Geographic and marketing perspective of participants represented in the study
    • Job titles of benchmark participants