1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
60624993444CE485E00258C7500302053
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/disease-awareness-program-excellence-oncology-structure-activities-resources-needed-effective-pipeline-support
18
19
2018.97.9.172
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25BMR




» Products & Services » » Product Launch » Influences on Market Entry

Disease Awareness Program Excellence in Oncology: Structure, Activities, and Resources Needed for Effective Pipeline Support

ID: PSM-397


Features:

10 Info Graphics

41 Data Graphics

750+ Metrics

11 Narratives


Pages: 62


Published: 2025


Delivery Format: Shipped


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 

919-403-0251

  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • STUDY SNAPSHOT
  • KEY FINDINGS
  • VIEW TOC AND LIST OF EXHIBITS
In oncology, where early detection can significantly improve outcomes and treatment innovations evolve rapidly, disease awareness campaigns are essential to educate stakeholders and prepare the market for treatment success. Effective campaigns require strategic timing, customized messaging, and coordinated cross-functional planning to drive awareness and facilitate adoption.

This Best Practices, LLC study explores high-impact tactics and common pitfalls from leading oncology-focused disease awareness efforts. This report offers critical benchmarks on campaign structure, investment strategies, timing, key activities, and collaboration approaches that enable awareness and engagement across the cancer care ecosystem.

Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Manufacturing; Biotech; Consumer Products; Diagnostic; Medical Device; Chemical; Health Care; Communications; Biopharmaceutical; Clinical Research; Laboratories


Companies Profiled:
Bayer; Daiichi Sankyo; EMD Serono; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech; Merck KGaA; Merck Sharp & Dohme; NexGen Healthcare; Sanofi; Tokai Pharmaceuticals

Study Snapshot

Best Practices, LLC engaged 11 leaders from 10 life sciences companies specializing in oncology therapies for this benchmarking research. Select executives participated in detailed operational interviews. Relevant secondary research is incorporated to enrich the analysis.

Key topics covered in this report include:

  • Oncology disease awareness program structure
  • Timing of disease awareness activities
  • Budget and spending for oncology disease awareness campaigns
  • Partnering with Advocacy Groups and Legal
  • Use of social media in oncology disease awareness

Key Findings

Select key insights uncovered from this report are noted below. Detailed findings are available in the full report.

  • Structure: Manufacturers with large, single country footprints or extensive portfolios tend to default to decentralized and hybrid disease awareness structures.
  • Disease Awareness Funding: Plan for a long-term commitment as disease awareness resourcing often starts at the end of phase 3 and ends three years after launch.
Table of Contents

Sr. No.
Topic
Slide No.
I.
Overview and ObjectivesPg. 3-6
II.
Program Effectiveness: Practices & PitfallsPg. 7-10
III.
Program StructurePg. 11-15
IV.
Tactics and TimingPg. 16-24
V.
Budget and SpendingPg. 25-35
VI.
Involvement of Advocacy Groups and Legal in Disease AwarenessPg. 36-48
VII.
Social MediaPg. 49-58
VIII.
Participant DemographicsPg. 59-61
IX.
About Best Practices, LLCPg. 62

    List of Charts & Exhibits

    I. Program Effectiveness: Practices & Pitfalls

    • Evaluating effectiveness of oncology-focused disease awareness programs
    • Best practices for maintaining an effective Oncology-specific disease awareness program
    • Common pitfalls in planning or executing cancer-focused awareness initiatives

    II. Program Structure

    • Organizational structure of oncology disease awareness programs – Total benchmark class
    • Organizational structure of oncology disease awareness programs – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma, Global teams vs. Country level teams, Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Functional involvement and leadership of oncology disease awareness campaigns
    • Presence of a distinct group for handling oncology-specific disease state awareness programs

    III. Tactics and Timing

    • Start and endpoints for resourcing oncology disease awareness efforts – Total benchmark class
    • Start and endpoints for resourcing oncology disease awareness efforts – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Start and endpoints for resourcing oncology disease awareness efforts – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Start and endpoints for resourcing oncology disease awareness efforts – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Start and endpoints for resourcing oncology disease awareness efforts – – Highly competitive market vs. Less competitive market
    • Interview narratives around the dividends from disease awareness programs
    • Timing and use of disease awareness activities
    • Most utilized oncology-specific disease awareness activities

    IV. Budget and Spending

    • Timing of oncology disease awareness investment across development and launch cycle
    • Total budget for oncology disease awareness initiatives, activities and programs – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Peak year oncology disease awareness investment – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Total budget for oncology disease awareness initiatives, activities and programs – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Total budget for oncology disease awareness initiatives, activities and programs – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Oncology-specific factors that shape disease awareness funding – Total benchmark class
    • Oncology-specific factors that shape disease awareness funding – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Oncology-specific factors that shape disease awareness funding – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Functions providing funding for oncology disease awareness programs
    • Disease awareness investment for new oncology products addressing unmet clinical needs

    V. Involvement of Advocacy Groups and Legal in Disease Awareness

    • Interview narratives around patient advocacy group relationships
    • Importance of each patient advocacy group activity and support service from a disease awareness program perspective – Total benchmark class
    • Importance of each patient advocacy group activity and support service from a disease awareness program perspective – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Importance of each patient advocacy group activity and support service from a disease awareness program perspective – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Best approaches to support disease awareness activities with cancer patient advocacy groups
    • Importance of highly effective patient advocacy group activities and support services from a disease awareness program perspective – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Importance of highly effective patient advocacy group activities and support services from a disease awareness program perspective – Highly competitive market vs. Less competitive market
    • Timing of disease awareness activities with patient advocacy groups
    • Level of involvement of legal department in each of the listed disease awareness program areas – Total benchmark class
    • Level of involvement of legal department in each of the listed disease awareness program areas – Global teams vs. Country level teams
    • Level of involvement of legal department in each of the listed disease awareness program areas – Single brand teams vs. Portfolio teams
    • Interview narrative around managing successful programs with legal groups

    VI. Social Media

    • Oncology disease awareness activities conducted on social media and timing of first initiation of each activity – Total benchmark class
    • Oncology disease awareness activities conducted on social media and timing of first initiation of each activity – Large pharma vs. Mid-small pharma
    • Utilization ranking of social media activities for generating disease awareness in oncology
    • Interview narrative around ensuring patient access via social media
    • Interview narrative around getting direct feedback and insights
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities – Total benchmark class
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities and percentage of overall disease awareness budget spent on social media – Large pharma
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities and percentage of overall disease awareness budget spent on social media – Global teams
    • Total investment in social media disease awareness activities and percentage of overall disease awareness budget spent on social media – Portfolio teams

    VII. Participant Demographics

    • Geographic and marketing perspective of participants represented in the study
    • Job titles of benchmark participants