1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
68523A81F1688EB0085256D330079733F
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/email-calendaring-systems-operational-strategies-and-interoperability-capabilities?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2018.97.9.171
21
22
23
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Business Operations » Information Technology

Email & Calendaring Systems: Operational Strategies and Interoperability Capabilities

DB Image

ID: 4435


Features:

Metrics, Graphics


Published: Pre-2019


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 

919-403-0251

  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
This document contains the results of a survey of 19 companies. The goal of this survey was to identify trends in email and calendaring systems. Survey data covers the following topics: Email and Calendaring Systems, System Interoperability, Anti-spam Systems, Email Policies. Among the metrics gathered are the most frequently used calendaring software, software for resource calendaring, instant messaging/chat, levels of interoperability, and percent of spam managed by anti-spam managers.

Industries Profiled:
Distribution; Retail; Professional Services; Health Care; Consulting; Financial Services; Manufacturing; Telecommunications; Pharmaceutical; Biotech; Consumer Products; Diagnostic; Medical Device; Insurance; Computer Software; High Tech; Electronics


Companies Profiled:
Avon; Trammell Crow; Altera; PT SUCOFINDO; State Street Australia Ltd; Tensar; Cegedim; Telus Corp.; Eli Lilly and Company; Bayer; JD Edwards; MetLife; Sun Microsystems; Texas Instruments; Xerox

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.