1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
619CA018DB64A4CF58525773100497955
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/external-communications-best-practices-optimizing-group-structure-resources?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2034.228.38.35
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




Products & Services Business Communications External Communication Excellence

External Communications Excellence: Optimizing Group Structure and Resources

ID: 5090


Features:

13 Info Graphics

17 Data Graphics

120+ Metrics


Pages/Slides: 36


Published: Pre-2013


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:
close

Single User: Authorizes use by the person who places the order or for whom the order was placed.

Sitewide: Authorizes use of the report for a geographic site. All people at site can view the report for a year and copies can be printed.

Corporate: Authorizes use for the entire company for a year and copies can be printed. No limitations for usage inside the company.




Buy Now

 


  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
Non-members: Click here to review a complimentary excerpt from "External Communications Excellence: Optimizing Group Structure and Resources"

STUDY OVERVIEW

As companies grow, effective external communications activities help organizations build strong stakeholder relationships and marketplace success. The external communications function is the public voice of an organization and thus represents a vital function. As the external communications function has evolved, its structure and resources have also changed over time.

Best Practices, LLC conducted this research to find out current trends in external communications with respect to its structural models, staffing and investment levels. This research study provides external communications trends and insights around structure and resources; communications leaders can use the study to compare their current structure and resources with that of leading companies.

KEY TOPICS

  • External Communications Group Structures: Key Trends & Drivers of Sub-group Evolution
  • Internal and External Communications Group Models and Structures
  • External Communications Group Resource Benchmarks: Key Staffing and Investment Trend

SAMPLE KEY METRICS
  • Functional factors affecting External Communications structure
  • Geographic factors affecting External Communications structure
  • Location of External Communications group
  • Approaches used to align External Communications with internal customers
  • Effectiveness of different staffing approaches for serving internal customers
  • Approaches to integrating U.S. and global External Communications structures
  • Level of External Communications leader
  • Leadership group that External Communications reports to
  • Number of External Communications FTEs, worldwide and U.S.
  • Percentage of External Communications outsourced
  • External Communications budget
  • Budget per External Communications employee
  • Percent of External Communications budget allocated to labor and non-labor categories
  • Sources of funding for External Communications group
SAMPLE KEY FINDING
  • Organizations struggle to find the best approach to integrating their U.S. and global team structures. Benchmark field results revealed nearly equal preferences for independent structures, mirrored structures and centralization. The multi-industry benchmark class showed a greater preference for complete centralization at headquarters than did the pharma segment, which favors independent or mirrored structures across continents.
  • The mean staffing level for External Communications groups across industries is 17% higher than the function’s mean staffing in pharma alone. Pharma does average 15% more staffing in the U.S., likely a reflection of the importance the U.S. market plays in the pharma sector.

METHODOLOGY

Participants in this benchmarking research included 32 Communications executives and managers at 28 leading companies from bio-pharmaceutical, healthcare and other industry segments. This research document is the result of a benchmarking survey and field interviews. Research participants included Vice President, Senior Directors, Directors, Managers and Specialists.


Industries Profiled:
Medical Device; Telecommunications; Health Care; Pharmaceutical; Diagnostic; Manufacturing; Utilities; Computer Hardware; Computer Software; Chemical; Insurance; Biotech; Transportation


Companies Profiled:
Medtronic; Maxcom; Eisai; Fluke; ConvaTec; MAPI; MSD; CraftBilt; Astellas; ABC Laboratories; Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals; National Grid; Merck; Ipca Laboratories; Amdocs; Veeda Clinical Research; GlaxoSmithKline; Intas; Grace; MetLife; Lilly; Baxter International; EMD Serono; Boehringer Ingelheim; AstraZeneca; Abbott; Medrad; Amgen; MDS Pharma Services; Alcon; Sanofi-aventis; Vertex Pharmaceuticals; Emirates Group


If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.