1<!DOCTYPE html>
2
3Anonymous
4/bestp
5/bestp/domrep.nsf
6F4FF21696D49F02785256FB600720991
8
9
10
11
12
13
140
15
16
17/bestp/domrep.nsf/products/rotational-development-programs-benchmarks-of-excellence?opendocument
18
19opendocument
2044.192.49.72
21
22
23www.best-in-class.com
24/bestp/domrep.nsf
25DB




» Products & Services » » Human Resources » Employee Development and Training » Career Path Planning

Rotational Development Programs: Benchmarks of Excellence

DB Image

ID: 4787


Features:

Metrics, Graphics


Pages/Slides: 31


Published: Pre-2019


Delivery Format: Online PDF Document


 

License Options:


Buy Now

 

919-403-0251

  • STUDY OVERVIEW
  • BENCHMARK CLASS
  • SPECIAL OFFER
NonMembers: Download a complimentary research excerpt here: http://www.best-in-class.com/de177.htm




Study Overview
Rotational development programs play a critical role in succession planning efforts and can help generate top-notch, well-rounded employees that can quickly move into management roles. This study identifies characteristics of leading rotational development programs for undergraduates and graduates. HR executives across various industries will be able to use this research to discover key practices, performance measures and trends of successful rotational development programs. This 31-slide presentation addresses a variety of topics, such as program logistics, program composition and structure, program impact, and top challenges and lessons learned.


Key Findings
1. The majority of benchmarked companies have fewer than 20 people in their rotational development program classes, which is a key definer of program success.
2. 86% of top rotational development programs accept individuals with majors directly related to the work function, compared with a slightly lower percentage (77%) of the benchmark class.
3. 73% of leading undergraduate and 90% of top graduate programs accept candidates into the programs only once a year.
4. Benchmark partners identified ongoing performance management, continuous feedback, and post-program follow-ups as key to developing high-quality candidates.

Methodology
This research originated from a Best Practices, LLC Internet Benchmarking Exchange. It was conducted for a Business Excellence Board member and was based on surveys with benchmark partners across various industries.


Industries Profiled:
Pharmaceutical; Banking; Financial Services; Health Care; Electronics; Internet; High Tech; Manufacturing; Diversified; Aerospace; Chemical; Technology; Biotech; Telecommunications; Diagnostic; Insurance; Defense; Consumer Products; Automobile; Retail; Research; Energy; Medical Device; Shipping


Companies Profiled:
Abbott Laboratories; PSEG; Novartis; Northern Trust Company; Merck; Manulife Financial; Janssen Cilag Pharmaceutical; Intel; IBM; Honeywell; GlaxoSmithKline; GE; FedEx; Ericsson; Chiquita Brands International; Carrier Corp.; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Bank of America; BAE Systems; Amgen; American Express

If you purchase Best Practice Database document(s), you will have 30 days from the date of purchase to apply some or all of the cost of the document(s) toward the cost of a Full Access Individual, Pharma, Group or University Membership. Write us at DatabaseTeam@bestpracticesllc.com or call David Guinn at 919-767-9179 if you have any questions.